Active Research
Occupational safety and health is evolving to embrace multi-dimensional approaches that enhance worker well-being, including personal experiences and social determinants of health. This shift addresses significant changes in work participation influenced by emerging technologies, workforce characteristics, and evolving organizational contexts. Numerous initiatives highlight the necessity for knowledge generation and translation to foster worker health as we transition from Industry 4.0 to 5.0. This evolution reflects a move from understanding how smart technologies affect where and when we work (4.0) to how human-centered technologies, like artificial intelligence, influence how and with whom we work, including interactions with non-human coworkers (5.0).
These shifts present opportunities to expand scholarship supporting worker health in evolving work environments. Our research integrates occupational therapy approaches and occupational science theory to examine the complexities of human performance as transactions occur between contextual factors and individual experiences. We aim to develop tailored strategies to improve worker health and well-being by exploring human-context-occupation interactions and the impact of workplace technologies.
Promoting Worker Health in Novel and Emerging Contexts
MSOP is engaged in multiple projects examining the intersection of novel and emerging individual factors or modes of work on performance, health, and well-being. These projects explore how chronic health conditions, personal experiences, and emerging modes of work, such as gig or app-based work, contribute to or create unique or generalized contextual circumstances that can positively or negatively affect individual worker health. Through these projects, we aim to learn how these circumstances intersect with workers’ ability to flourish and live meaningful, productive lives.
Implications of Workplace Technologies on Health, Well-being, and Performance
Technological advancements are reshaping how work is conducted, often without considering their impact on workers. The MSOP research approach values workers as individuals with unique needs rather than generic technology users; our projects incorporate workers’ perspectives as we study, develop, and implement workplace technology. Our detailed work in office worker wellness and stress detection highlights the development of human-centric technology that promotes health, well-being, and performance. In other transdisciplinary efforts, we collaborate with civil engineers to create a multi-sensory workstation that allows remote operation of demolition robots. MSOP leads participant-engaged aspects of the project, involving demolition workers and construction managers, to ensure their experiences inform technology development. Through this partnership, we’ve recognized the need to assess how new construction technologies influence worker health and performance, as well as to improve training for this evolving technology-supported work.
Resources for Developing and Implementing Safe and Effective Workplace Technologies
Our team is actively developing resources for scientists, technology developers, employers, and employees to promote the development and implementation of technologies that fully consider the broad array of factors related to workers’ health and well-being. These efforts consider the broad spectrum of workplace technologies, including those that are fully autonomous, such as technology embedded within built or physical contexts, those that complete tasks under the direction of workers, such as generative AI, and those that collaborate or cooperate with workers, such as augmented reality with computer-assisted object identification.
Funding
Demolishing Barriers to Democratize Future Construction Operations by Providing Multi-sensory Capabilities for Effective Remote Work
Funding Sponsor: NSF - Division of Electrical, Communications, and Cyber Systems (ECCS); Future of Work at the Human-Technology Frontier Program (FW-HTF)
PI: Becerik-Gerber; Co-PIs: Lucas, Roll, Soibelman
Award Number: 2222572
Total Funding: $1,799,999
Funding Period: 10/1/22 - 9/30/26
Exploring occupational adaptation in response to the evolving nature of work in the digital age
Funding Sponsor: Society for the Study of Occupation: USA
PI: Fang
Total Funding: $1,000
Funding Period: 9/1/24 – 8/31/26
Mitigating Risk and Promoting Occupational Safety and Health When Developing and Integrating AI in the Workplace
Funding Sponsor: CDC - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
PI: Roll
Award Number: 22IPA2216235
Total Funding: $104,226
Funding Period: 9/1/22 - 8/31/25
Understanding social determinants of health and health disparities in emerging work contexts
Funding Sponsor: National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD/NIH)
PI: Walsh
Award Number: F32-MD020253
Total Funding: $224,868
Funding Period: 10/1/24 – 9/30/27
Understanding work as a social determinant of health
Funding Sponsor: USC Office of Undergraduate Programs
Award: Undergraduate Research Associates Program Grant
PI: Roll
Total Costs: $6,000
Funding Period: 8/16/25 – 5/15/26
Facilitating post-COVID return-to-work: Triangulation of patient, provider, and employer perspectives
Funding Sponsor: USC Chan Division
Award: ReSPONs Initiative Pilot Grant
PI: Aldrich
Total Costs: $49,605
Funding Period: 2/1/23 – 5/30/24
Publications
Fukumura, Y. E., Wolff, A., Kijel, M. T., Lin, E., & Roll, S. C. (2025). Mapping review of musician well-being literature. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene , 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2544749 Show abstract
While musician health literature has grown significantly in the past three decades, a holistic understanding of musician well-being remains lacking. This mapping review aimed to create a topographical review of existing literature on musician well-being to identify key knowledge gaps. This review sought to identify the aspects of musician well-being that have recently been studied, the musician populations that have been studied, and the study designs that have been used to assess musician well-being. This mapping review design was informed by the Focused Mapping Review and Synthesis (FMRS) approach. Studies were categorized and visualized based on study design, type of musician sampled (i.e., profession, instrument, musical genre), and well-being determinants, using the Ecology of Musical Performance (EMP) Model as a foundational framework. This review found that the majority of well-being studies identified focused on musculoskeletal health. Additionally, few intervention studies were identified, and all involved samples of music students in intervention studies were in K-12 or higher education programs. While the EMP model proposes a holistic approach to understanding musician well-being, many crucial well-being determinants highlighted by the model have not been recently studied within the musician health research. Addressing these gaps will provide a more comprehensive foundation for improving the health and well-being of all musicians.
Keywords. Literature review, mapping review, musician health, well-being
Rodrigues, P. B., Becerik-Gerber, B., Soibelman, L., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2025). Impact of selective environmental sound attenuation on operator performance, stress, attention, and task engagement in teleoperated demolition. Automation in Construction, 169, 105876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105876 Show abstract
The noise produced in demolition sites can mask safety-critical sounds that inform operators about task conditions and hazards. These problems are exacerbated in teleoperated demolition, where the separation between operator and site compromises operators' situation awareness and cognitive loads. This paper assessed the effects of environmental sounds with and without attenuation on the operators' performance and response (e.g., stress, attention, task engagement) during teleoperated demolition. Eighty participants completed three virtual demolition tasks under different environmental sound conditions, i.e., no sound (NS), unfiltered sound (US), and filtered sound (FS) with 20-dB attenuation of background noise and robot's sounds to allow focus on safety and task conditions. The results show that US induced more stress than NS and FS. Also, FS resulted in fewer collisions, faster reaction times, and greater attention and task engagement than US. These results can support the design of sound feedback interfaces for teleoperation in construction.
Keywords. Demolition, Electrodermal activity, Environmental sound, Heart rate variability, Performance, Robot, Safety, Stress, Teleoperation
Hernandez, R., Aldrich, R., Schneider, S., Stone, A. A., Roll, S. C., & Pyatak, E. A. (2024). Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to understand occupation from the perspective of the experiencing self: An illustrative example in workers with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Occupational Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2024.2431138 Show abstract
In people, the experiencing, remembering, and believing selves are distinct modes of being that co-exist, though at any particular moment one mode can be dominant. While qualitative methods are effective for querying the remembering and believing selves, Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) methods may be better suited to capture the perspective of the experiencing self. Using EMA to investigate occupation allows participants to engage in their regular occupations in their natural environments, pausing to record information about experiences that occurred seconds or minutes prior. To demonstrate the use of EMA to capture the experiencing self (the ‘I’ in the present moment not occupied with memories or beliefs), we examined associations between working, recovering, and various aspects of being (e.g., mood) in secondary analyses using EMA data from workers with type one diabetes (T1D, n = 92). Densely repeated sampling of workers’ experiences through EMA allowed for a correspondingly comprehensive representation of how both working and recovering were associated with various aspects of being, yielding insights relevant to the clinical needs of workers with T1D and to understanding their experiencing self’s view of work and recovery generally. The potential benefits of EMA for occupational science include allowing a more comprehensive understanding of the immediate experience of occupation, enabling investigation of the experiencing self at different timescales (e.g., experience of work in the moment, versus average experience of work over a day), and providing additional means through which to inform occupation centered interventions in populations with chronic conditions.
Keywords. Occupational science, ecological momentary assessment, experience sampling method, work, recovery from work, experiencing self, diabetes
Lucas, G. M., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Roll, S. C. (2024). Calibrating workers’ trust in intelligent automated systems. Patterns, 5(9), 101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.101045 Show abstract
With the exponential rise in the prevalence of automation, trust in such technology has become more critical than ever before. Trust is confidence in a particular entity, especially in regard to the consequences they can have for the trustor, and calibrated trust is the extent to which the judgments of trust are accurate. The focus of this paper is to reevaluate the general understanding of calibrating trust in automation, update this understanding, and apply it to worker’s trust in automation in the workplace. Seminal models of trust in automation were designed for automation that was already common in workforces, where the machine’s “intelligence” (i.e., capacity for decision making, cognition, and/or understanding) was limited. Now, burgeoning automation with more human-like intelligence is intended to be more interactive with workers, serving in roles such as decision aid, assistant, or collaborative coworker. Thus, we revise “calibrated trust in automation” to include more intelligent automated systems.
Keywords. trust, automation, calibrated trust, workers
Rodrigues, P. B., Becerik-Gerber, B., Soibelman, L., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2024). Virtual environment for studying the effects of operational and environmental sounds on teleoperated demolition. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2023 (pp. 54–61). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485231.007 Show abstract
Teleoperated robots are increasingly being used in construction sites, but there is still a need for better human-robot interfaces. Auditory feedback using sonification has commonly been used to complement visual feedback in teleoperation applications. However, it is not yet well understood how operational and environmental sounds can support operators in complex tasks such as construction machine operations. In this paper, we describe the development of a virtual environment to assess the impacts of operational and environmental sounds on operators’ performances and cognitive loads during teleoperated demolition. Our goal is to examine whether different levels of operational and environmental sounds can increase the workers’ situation awareness, operational efficiency, and safety performance. Alternatively, we anticipate that some environmental noises may negatively affect the operators’ performances by increasing their mental workload and stress levels. Consequently, we plan to evaluate the effectiveness of including audio filters that minimize unwanted sounds while prioritizing desired sounds.
Awada, M., Becerik Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2024). Stress appraisal in the workplace and its associations with productivity and mood: Insights from a multimodal machine learning analysis. PLoS ONE, 19(1), e0296468. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296468 Show abstract
Previous studies have primarily focused on predicting stress arousal, encompassing physiological, behavioral, and psychological responses to stressors, while neglecting the examination of stress appraisal. Stress appraisal involves the cognitive evaluation of a situation as stressful or non-stressful, and as a threat/pressure or a challenge/opportunity. In this study, we investigated several research questions related to the association between states of stress appraisal (i.e., boredom, eustress, coexisting eustress-distress, distress) and various factors such as stress levels, mood, productivity, physiological and behavioral responses, as well as the most effective ML algorithms and data signals for predicting stress appraisal. The results support the Yerkes-Dodson law, showing that a moderate stress level is associated with increased productivity and positive mood, while low and high levels of stress are related to decreased productivity and negative mood, with distress overpowering eustress when they coexist. Changes in stress appraisal relative to physiological and behavioral features were examined through the lenses of stress arousal, activity engagement, and performance. An XGBOOST model achieved the best prediction accuracies of stress appraisal, reaching 82.78% when combining physiological and behavioral features and 79.55% using only the physiological dataset. The small accuracy difference of 3% indicates that physiological data alone may be adequate to accurately predict stress appraisal, and the feature importance results identified electrodermal activity, skin temperature, and blood volume pulse as the most useful physiologic features. Implementing these models within work environments can serve as a foundation for designing workplace policies, practices, and stress management strategies that prioritize the promotion of eustress while reducing distress and boredom. Such efforts can foster a supportive work environment to enhance employee well-being and productivity.
Awada, M., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G., & Roll, S. (2023). Predicting office workers’ productivity: A machine learning approach integrating physiological, behavioral, and psychological indicators. Sensors, 23(21), 8694. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218694 Show abstract
This research pioneers the application of a machine learning framework to predict the perceived productivity of office workers using physiological, behavioral, and psychological features. Two approaches were compared: the baseline model, predicting productivity based on physiological and behavioral characteristics, and the extended model, incorporating predictions of psychological states such as stress, eustress, distress, and mood. Various machine learning models were utilized and compared to assess their predictive accuracy for psychological states and productivity, with XGBoost emerging as the top performer. The extended model outperformed the baseline model, achieving an R2 of 0.60 and a lower MAE of 10.52, compared to the baseline model’s R2 of 0.48 and MAE of 16.62. The extended model’s feature importance analysis revealed valuable insights into the key predictors of productivity, shedding light on the role of psychological states in the prediction process. Notably, mood and eustress emerged as significant predictors of productivity. Physiological and behavioral features, including skin temperature, electrodermal activity, facial movements, and wrist acceleration, were also identified. Lastly, a comparative analysis revealed that wearable devices (Empatica E4 and H10 Polar) outperformed workstation addons (Kinect camera and computer-usage monitoring application) in predicting productivity, emphasizing the potential utility of wearable devices as an independent tool for assessment of productivity. Implementing the model within smart workstations allows for adaptable environments that boost productivity and overall well-being among office workers.
Keywords. productivity; stress; mood; eustress; distress; psychological state; physiological features; behavioral features
Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G., Aryal, A., Awada, M., Bergés, M., Billington, S., Boric-Lubecke, O., Ghahramani, A., Heydarian, A., Höelscher, C., Jazizadeh, F., Khan, A., Langevin, J., Liu, R., Marks, F., Mauriello, M. L., Murnane, E., Noh, H., Pritoni, M., Roll, S., Schaumann, D., Seyedrezaei, M., Taylor, J. E., Zhao, J., & Zhu, R. (2022). The field of human building interaction for convergent research and innovation for intelligent built environments. Scientific Reports, 12, 22092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25047-y Show abstract
Human-Building Interaction (HBI) is a convergent field that represents the growing complexities of the dynamic interplay between human experience and intelligence within built environments. This paper provides core definitions, research dimensions, and an overall vision for the future of HBI as developed through consensus among 25 interdisciplinary experts in a series of facilitated workshops. Three primary areas contribute to and require attention in HBI research: humans (human experiences, performance, and well-being), buildings (building design and operations), and technologies (sensing, inference, and awareness). Three critical interdisciplinary research domains intersect these areas: control systems and decision making, trust and collaboration, and modeling and simulation. Finally, at the core, it is vital for HBI research to center on and support equity, privacy, and sustainability. Compelling research questions are posed for each primary area, research domain, and core principle. State-of-the-art methods used in HBI studies are discussed, and examples of original research are offered to illustrate opportunities for the advancement of HBI research.
Keywords. Civil engineering; Environmental impact; Mechanical engineering; Occupational health; Quality of life
Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G., Aryal, A., Awada, M., Bergés, M., Billington, S. L., Boric-Lubecke, O., Ghahramani, A., Heydarian, A., Jazizadeh, F., Liu, R., Zhu, R., Marks, F., Roll, S., Seyedrezaei, M., Taylor, J. E., Höelscher, C., Khan, A., Langevin, J., Mauriello, M. L., Murnane, E., Noh, H., Pritoni, M., Schaumann, D., & Zhao, J. (2022). Ten questions concerning human-building interaction research for improving the quality of life. Building and Environment, 226, 109681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109681 Show abstract
This paper seeks to address ten questions that explore the burgeoning field of Human-Building Interaction (HBI), an interdisciplinary field that represents the next frontier in convergent research and innovation to enable the dynamic interplay of human and building interactional intelligence. The field of HBI builds on several existing efforts in historically separate research fields/communities and aims to understand how buildings affect human outcomes and experiences, as well as how humans interact with, adapt to, and affect the built environment and its systems, to support buildings that can learn, enable adaptation, and evolve at different scales to improve the quality-of-life of its users while optimizing resource usage and service availability. Questions were developed by a diverse group of researchers with backgrounds in design, engineering, computer science, social science, and health science. Answers to these questions draw conclusions from what has been achieved to date as reported in the available literature and establish a foundation for future HBI research. This paper aims to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations in HBI research to change the way people interact with and perceive technology within the context of buildings and inform the design, construction, and operation of next-generation, intelligent built environments. In doing so, HBI research can realize a myriad of benefits for human users, including improved productivity, health, cognition, convenience, and comfort, all of which are essential to societal well-being.
Keywords. Building lifecycle; Human-centered; Occupants; Built environment; Well-being; Interaction; Quality of life
Roll, S. C., Lucas, G. M., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2021). Authors’ response to “Work from home (WFH) during COVID-19: Is virtual reality (VR) a new solution to new problems?”. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(10), e757-e758. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002340 Show abstract
Fukumura, Y. E., McLaughlin Gray, J., Lucas, G. M., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Roll, S. C. (2021). Worker perspectives on incorporating artificial intelligence into office workspaces: Implications for the future of office work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 1(4), 1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041690 Show abstract
Workplace environments have a significant impact on worker performance, health, and well-being. With machine learning capabilities, artificial intelligence (AI) can be developed to automate individualized adjustments to work environments (e.g., lighting, temperature) and to facilitate healthier worker behaviors (e.g., posture). Worker perspectives on incorporating AI into office workspaces are largely unexplored. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore office workers’ views on including AI in their office workspace. Six focus group interviews with a total of 45 participants were conducted. Interview questions were designed to generate discussion on benefits, challenges, and pragmatic considerations for incorporating AI into office settings. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an iterative approach. Two primary constructs emerged. First, participants shared perspectives related to preferences and concerns regarding communication and interactions with the technology. Second, numerous conversations highlighted the dualistic nature of a system that collects large amounts of data; that is, the potential benefits for behavior change to improve health and the pitfalls of trust and privacy. Across both constructs, there was an overarching discussion related to the intersections of AI with the complexity of work performance. Numerous thoughts were shared relative to future AI solutions that could enhance the office workplace. This study’s findings indicate that the acceptability of AI in the workplace is complex and dependent upon the benefits outweighing the potential detriments. Office worker needs are complex and diverse, and AI systems should aim to accommodate individual needs.
Keywords. workspace; office work; computer workstations; artificial intelligence
Aryal, A., Becerik-Gerber, B., Anselmo, F., Roll, S. C., & Lucas, G. (2019). Smart desks to promote comfort, health and productivity in offices: A vision for future workplaces. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5, 76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00076 Show abstract
People spend most of their day in buildings, and a large portion of the energy in buildings is used to control the indoor environment for creating acceptable conditions for occupants. However, majority of the building systems are controlled based on a ‘one size fits all’ scheme which cannot account for individual occupant preferences. This leads to discomfort, low satisfaction and negative impacts on occupants’ productivity, health and well-being. In this paper, we describe our vision of how recent advances in Internet of Things (IoT) and machine learning can be used to add intelligence to an office desk to personalize the environment around the user. The smart desk can learn individual user preferences for the indoor environment, personalize the environment based on user preferences, and act as an intelligent support system for improving user comfort, health and productivity. We briefly describe the recent advances made in different domains that can be leveraged to enhance occupant experience in buildings and describe the overall framework for the smart desk. We conclude the paper with a discussion of possible avenues for further research.
Keywords: Personalized environments, Smart desks, IoT (internet of things), Smart buildings, Indoor environment quality (IEQ)
Presentations
Fang, Y., Aldrich, R., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2025). Exploring occupational adaptation in response to the evolving nature of work in the digital age. [Paper presentation]. 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for the Study of Occupation: USA, Galveston, TX.
Rodrigues, P. B., Wang, Z., Fang, Y., Becerik-Gerber, B., Soibelman, L., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2025). A teleoperation interface for robotic demolition: Designing for operators’ sensory and adaptation needs. [Paper presentation]. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB) World Building Congress, West Lafayette, IN.
Wang, Z., Rodrigues, P. B., Fang, Y., Soibelman, L., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2025). Understanding potential challenges in demolition robot teleoperation to inform interface design: Insights from industry professionals. [Paper presentation]. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB) World Building Congress, West Lafayette, IN.
Fang, Y., Roll, S. C., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., & Soibelman, L. (2024). Using a community-engaged approach to develop a safe and effective teleoperation workstation in construction. [Paper presentation]. ASPIRE - International Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Phoenix, AZ.
Roll, S. C., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Lucas, G. M. (2023). Developing a framework for the safe and effective development and implementation of artificial intelligence in the workplace. [Webinar presentation]. Artificial Intelligence Interest Group of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, virtual event.
Roll, S. C. (2023). Leveraging worker-environment-technology transactions to maximize health, well-being, and performance in Industry 4.0. [Visiting professor presentation]. Duke University, Divisions of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Durham, NC.
Parga, M., Fang, Y., & Roll, S. C. (2023). OS at work: Transdisciplinary opportunities to improve health and occupational performance in technology-enabled workplaces. [Panel presentation]. 21st Annual Conference of the Society for the Study of Occupation: USA, St. Louis, MO.
Roll, S. C., Fukumura, Y. E., Sommerich, C. M., & Evans, K. D. (2023). Is ergonomics enough? Appreciating multilayered transactions within work systems to support worker health and well-being. [Paper presentation]. 21st Annual Conference of the Society for the Study of Occupation: USA, St. Louis, MO.
Roll, S. C., Cutchin, M., Park, M., & Smith, R. O. (2022). Contributions of occupational science and occupational therapy to well-being in built environments. [Panel presentation]. International Network of Networks for Well-being in the Built Environment, virtual event.
Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2022). AI and other technologies to support health and wellbeing in the workplace. [Platform presentation]. Marconi Conference of the Office Ergonomics Research Committee, Atlanta, GA.
Roll, S. C., Marchioni, M., & Becerik-Gerber, B. (2022). Well-being and inclusion in the built environment: Integrating an occupational perspective into an emerging transdisciplinary field. [Paper presentation]. 18th World Federation of Occupational Therapists International Congress and Exhibition, Paris, France.
Fukumura, Y. E., Kijel, M. T., Xiao, Y., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2022). Artificial intelligence to support worker health, well-being, and participation: Using an occupational lens for workplace technology development. [Paper presentation]. 18th World Federation of Occupational Therapists International Congress and Exhibition, Paris, France.
Roll, S. C., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Lucas, G. M. (2022). Leveraging a transdisciplinary approach to develop effective AI solutions to reduce risk and promote worker health. [Webinar presentation]. Artificial Intelligence Interest Group of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; virtual event.
Roll, S. C. (2021). Enhancing worker health through multi-level, transdisciplinary research. [Honorary Awardee Lecture]. American Occupational Therapy Foundation Research Excellence Symposium; virtual event.
Roll, S. C., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., Awada, M., & Xiao, Y. (2021). Healthy occupational engagement in built environments: Lessons learned from work-from-home transitions during COVID-19. [Paper presentation]. 27th USC Chan Occupational Science Symposium; virtual event.
Fukumura, Y. E., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on work: The transactional nature of work from home. [Paper presentation]. 27th USC Chan Occupational Science Symposium; virtual event.
Fukumura, Y. E., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. M., & Roll, S. C. (2020). Understanding office worker behavior to inform an artificial intelligence workstation. [Poster presentation]. NIH Health in Buildings Roundtable Conference, Virtual Presentation.
Roll, S. C. (2019). Consideration of humans as ‘occupational beings’ in human-building interactions. [Paper presentation]. NSF Workshop on Dynamic Interaction of Embodied Human and Machine Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA.
Aryal, A., Becerik-Gerber, B., Anselmo, F., Roll, S. C., & Lucas, G. (2018). Smart desk to promote health and productivity. [Poster presentation]. NIH/NSF/CDC/GSA Health in Buildings for Today and Tomorrow: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Health and the Sustainable Built Environment, Bethesda, MD.
Social