Gale M. Lucas PhD

Objective. To explore how hybrid workspaces (home vs. office) affect productivity and well-being, and whether indoor environmental quality (IEQ) mediates these associations.

Methods. Nineteen office workers were followed for four months, contributing 4,559 ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) of productivity, mood, stress, and eustress-distress appraisal. Continuous IEQ monitoring captured CO₂, TVOCs, PM₂.₅, temperature, humidity, and noise. Mixed-effects and multilevel mediation models assessed within-person associations.

Results. Office work was associated with higher productivity and greater eustress-distress coexistence, while home work was associated with higher boredom. Mood differences were small, and stress was modestly lower at home. Home workspaces showed poorer air quality. CO₂ and TVOCs were indirectly associated with mood and stress differences.

Conclusions. Hybrid work outcomes differ by location and are partly explained by IEQ, suggesting residential air quality as an occupational health intervention target.

This study examines environmental comfort differences between home and office workspaces and their associations with productivity and well-being among 19 knowledge workers monitored over four months via ecological momentary assessments. Participants rated comfort across four domains (lighting, temperature, air quality, noise) and reported productivity, mood, stress, and stress states four times daily. Mixed-effects models indicated domain-specific patterns: offices showed higher comfort for lighting (OR=0.56) and noise (OR=0.48), while temperature showed individual heterogeneity. Lighting and temperature comfort were positively associated with productivity (4.3% and 2.4% increase per comfort level), while comfort showed weak associations with mood and stress. Bayesian multinomial models suggested that higher comfort was associated with lower odds of boredom (ORs=0.40-0.56). Substantial between-person heterogeneity was observed in the direction and magnitude of home-office differences in comfort, well-being, and productivity, suggesting that hybrid policies may not be one-size-fits-all and may benefit from greater flexibility, though these findings should be interpreted as exploratory.

Demolition is among the most complex and hazardous sectors of construction, where workers need to work in rapidly changing and cluttered environments. Teleoperation offers a promising approach to reducing operators’ exposure to on-site hazards by enabling remote control of demolition robots, yet existing interfaces are often insufficiently grounded in operators’ needs or validated through real-world testing. This paper presents a sensory-enhanced teleoperation workstation prototype that operationalizes operators’ sensory needs identified in prior studies. The prototype translates these needs into multimodal sensing channels, associated data-flow structures, and corresponding workstation features. It provides a platform for subsequent studies to understand how operators engage with sensory information in real-world scenarios. The prototype also holds the potential to inform operator training and teleoperation research for other demolition machines and related contexts.

As teleoperated robots become more common on construction sites, human-robot interfaces must better support operators’ sensory needs. This paper presents results from a pilot study comparing a proposed sensory-enhanced teleoperation interface for compact demolition robots with a standard teleoperation interface. Recommendations from demolition stakeholders informed the design of the sensory-enhanced interface, while the standard interface was based on commercially available teleoperated construction equipment. The goal of this study was to refine the sensory-enhanced interface based on user feedback. Ten construction workers tested the interfaces, and we measured their perceived usability, telepresence, and trust in technology.

Background: Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) significantly influences occupant stress in office settings, yet the combined effects of multiple environmental stressors, moderated by personal characteristics, remain underexplored. Objective: This study examines the interaction effects of air temperature, lighting correlated colour temperature (CCT), and background noise on stress responses among office workers, with attention to individual differences in gender and body mass index (BMI). Methods: A mixed-design controlled experiment was conducted with 52 young adults in an open plan office within a North American Mediterranean climate, varying temperature (20 °C vs. 25 °C), CCT (2700 K vs. 6500 K), and noise level (50 dB vs. 65 dB). Stress was assessed using physiological and psychological indicators. Key Results: Stress responses were shaped not by individual environmental attributes in isolation, but through complex interactions among temperature, CCT, and noise, further moderated by BMI and gender. Individuals with overweight/obese BMI showed heightened sensitivity to warm temperatures, cool CCT, and high noise, while males exhibited greater sympathetic activation under warm and noisy conditions compared to females. Implications: These findings underscore that a one-size-fits-all approach to office environmental design is insufficient. Accounting for occupant heterogeneity, particularly BMI and gender, is essential for developing personalized IEQ strategies that promote workplace well-being. Keywords: health, heart rate variability, indoor environmental quality, interaction effect, stress

Teleoperation is receiving intense attention due to its potential to address health and safety concerns for construction workers caused by on-site hazards. It allows operators to control robots from a distance outside their field of view using wireless communication technologies. Currently one of the most frequently deployed robotic technologies in construction is the remotely operated demolition robot within the field of view. While distance teleoperation offers great potential for enhancing worker safety and addressing labor shortages, the complex and dynamic demolition sites present unique challenges. This paper introduces the preliminary results of a study that explored potential challenges in demolition robot teleoperation, informed by the challenges identified in traditional demolition machine operations and the key concerns raised by industry professionals. A user-centered approach was employed through narrative interviews and focus groups with demolition professionals. The findings indicate that the challenges faced in traditional demolition machine operations may persist in teleoperation and could be further exacerbated by the sensory degradation inherent in teleoperation. Besides, the interactions among challenges increase the complexity of their overall impact. Moreover, enhancing operators’ situational awareness without inducing cognitive overload or distraction is critical for effectively addressing these challenges. Additionally, the results suggest the need for context-aware, multimodal teleoperation interfaces to assist operators in managing operational challenges. This study contributes to understanding challenges that operators may face during teleoperation, offering valuable insights for developing teleoperation interfaces adaptable to diverse demolition contexts.