Gabby Granados OTD, OTR/L, LRC (she/her/ella)

Background. Lifestyle Redesign® occupational therapy (LR-OT) originated in the Well Elderly studies as a preventive intervention for older adults, demonstrating positive health and cost outcomes. Although LR-OT later expanded to chronic condition management and inspired numerous programme adaptations for different contexts and populations, systematic reporting of intervention modifications remains scarce. This gap extends beyond OT, reflecting a broader movement in implementation science.

Purpose. This study applies the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to systematically document adaptations across four LR-OT programmes. Additionally, we examine fidelity-consistency by mapping programme components to the Well Elderly programme and core LR-OT elements.

Methods. Four teams implementing adapted programmes—diabetic foot ulcer self-management, primary care chronic condition management, Remodeler sa Vie for French-Canadian older adults, and LR weight management—participated in a structured mapping exercise to align programmes with FRAME and LR-OT principle components.

Results. Adaptation approaches varied from highly structured to loosely standardized methods. Despite numerous modifications, all programmes strongly aligned with LR-OT's core characteristics and domains.

Conclusion. This study highlights LR-OT's adaptability across diverse contexts while maintaining fidelity to its foundational framework. Findings contribute to implementation research, providing a model for systematically documenting and characterizing adaptations made to client-centred, evidence-based OT programmes.

Background. Young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus often face challenges managing their condition, leading to elevated glucose and heightened psychosocial distress. Diabetes care traditionally focuses on biomedical outcomes, with less emphasis on well-being. Occupational therapy offers a holistic approach to managing diabetes by integrating changes to daily habits and routines and psychosocial support.

Methods. This randomized controlled trial involved participants aged 18–30 with HbA1c ≥ 7.5 % (≥58 mmol/mol). Participants received either telehealth occupational therapy or usual care. The intervention addressed diabetes management, daily habits and routines, and emotional well-being. Data collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months included HbA1c, continuous glucose monitoring metrics, and psychosocial outcomes. Analyses employed intent-to-treat principles, using ANCOVA to evaluate between-group differences.

Results. Participants (n = 209) were 24.3 (±3.7) years old, 59.8 % female, 44.5 % non-Hispanic White, and 47.4 % publicly insured. No significant differences were found in glycemic outcomes. Intervention participants had improved diabetes-related quality of life (DQoL; least-squares [LS] mean 0.67, 95 % CI 0.02 to 1.32, p = 0.045) and reduced diabetes distress (LS-mean −0.36, CI −0.65 to −0.07, p = 0.01).

Conclusion. Generalizability may be impacted by external factors related to COVID-19. The findings suggest occupational therapy may be beneficial for young adults experiencing diabetes-related distress and poor DQoL.

Background. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic condition affecting nearly 1.9 million people in the United States. Young adults (YAs) with T1D face unique challenges in managing their condition, experiencing poorer health and well-being than other age groups. The current study is evaluating the Resilient, Empowered, Active Living (REAL) intervention, previously shown to improve glucose levels and quality of life among YAs with diabetes, using telehealth delivery (REAL-T) to expand reach and accessibility. This paper reports on the methodology and baseline participant characteristics of the REAL-T study.

Methods. REAL-T is a two-arm randomized controlled trial that recruited 18–30 year olds with T1D via clinics and social media advertising. Data collection, which was adapted to be fully remote due to COVID-19, occurs every three months for one year. Participants receive either usual care or a 6-month telehealth occupational therapy intervention. The primary outcome is glycated hemoglobin (A1c); secondary outcomes include diabetes distress, quality of life, and continuous glucose monitor-derived measures.

Results. The study enrolled a diverse sample of 209 YAs with T1D. Analysis of baseline data indicates equivalence between the intervention and control groups. Study participants have notably higher diabetes distress and poorer mental well-being than similar populations.

Conclusion. The REAL-T study successfully adapted to remote implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. By examining long-term outcomes, mediating pathways, and cost-effectiveness, the study will contribute knowledge of the impact of tailored interventions for YAs with T1D, designed to reduce disparities and improve health and well-being in this population.

Telehealth delivery of Lifestyle Redesign®, an occupational therapy intervention framework addressing health and quality of life among people with chronic conditions, is understudied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, satisfaction, and engagement of telehealth Lifestyle Redesign for young adults with diabetes. Using process data from two randomized controlled trials, we compared in-person and telehealth intervention effects. Among telehealth clients, effectiveness was assessed using pre-post changes in occupational performance, occupational satisfaction, and health management; a survey captured telehealth satisfaction. Attendance and engagement in in-person versus telehealth therapy were compared. Preliminary results indicate telehealth clients had significant increases in occupational performance, occupational satisfaction, and health management (all p < .02), and high levels of telehealth satisfaction. Intervention engagement (p = .59) and attendance (p = .42) were similar across treatment modalities. Telehealth delivery of Lifestyle Redesign occupational therapy is feasible and potentially efficacious, and continued advocacy is needed to ensure access to occupational therapy through telehealth.